Connect with us

Chelsea

How Boehly’s Chelsea is different than other US ownership

Boehly American ownership

The summer ownership takeover of Chelsea Football Club brought American Todd Boehly into the spotlight. Boehly, a front man for a consortium of investors, now heads one of the world’s most visible clubs.

Just months into the job, Boehly jumped head-first into club management. Most recently, he made some controversial statements about the future and health of the English game.

On Tuesday, Boehly made a suggestion the Premier League introduce an American-styled “All-Star Game.” The idea pits the northern clubs in Manchester or Liverpool and the Midlands against those in London and the south. Ideally, the American wants the match in the preseason, using the proceeds to fund clubs farther down in the league pyramid. This is badly needed, but perhaps could be better achieved in other ways. For instance, Premier League clubs themselves can pledge more money to grassroots efforts and lower leagues.

Also, Boehly also floated the idea of “playoff” for relegation, similar to that of Germany. He echoed those thoughts for European places, a platform used in the Netherlands.

Boehly’s Chelsea presents something new for American ownership in soccer

The previous high-level experience in sport Boehly boasts is running the Los Angeles Dodgers of Major League Baseball. It should be noted, the All-Star Game is a concept that originated in baseball. Traditionally, baseball priotizes the regular season more than other American sports. Yet, more recently, MLB expanded its playoff structure, taking away from some of the significance of the regular season.

In particular, the All-Star Game suggestion created controversy in the United Kingdom. Even Liverpool’s Jürgen Klopp denounced the idea following his Champions League victory on Tuesday. The idea appears to be a non-starter, but it’s critical to assess why Boehly would make it to begin with. 

To truly understand Boehly’s suggestions, we need to review his first few months in control of Chelsea. Moreover, examine the long-term ownership goals he and his group desire. His stewardship is likely to be very different than not only that of his Chelsea predecessor, Roman Abramovich. Boehly’s time at Chelsea will differ from other big-club ownership groups.

Boehly Premier League all-star game

Photo: Imago

Boehly’s changes

Initially upon taking control, Boehly chose to sack Chelsea’s three leading executives. He did this without designating logical replacements. Rather, the American took the reigns, albeit just temporarily, of the sporting side of the club. He bought and sold players in a fashion long-term executives or sporting directors would at clubs comparable to Chelsea. Boehly did this despite having zero experience in European soccer. 

Boehly’s summer of transfer spending and quick trigger on the sacking of Manager Thomas Tuchel has many in the UK media bothered. For example, popular pundit and former Manchester United player Gary Neville complained that Boehly is playing a real-life version of “Football Manager.” From the vantage point of seasoned analysts of the English game, Chelsea overpaid for several transfers. Instead of plugging holes in the squad, he added parts to a side that overloaded certain positions.

In fairness, Boehly inherited an unbalanced squad. However, it has become even further out-of-whack since his takeover.

A key factor to understand in assessing Boehly is that his group is largely private equity and investment banking. Clearlake Capital, Boehly’s group, differs from other Amerrican investors in big clubs. The goal is to raise the value of the asset they’ve purchased, more than short-term profits and floating a club publicly.

This makes Chelsea’s business model different from that of the Glazer family at Manchester United, for example. A desire for short-term profits and yearly dividend payments are at the heart of the Glazer’s stewardship of United. However, Boehly looks to be a long-term player. He wants to raise the value of the asset he is managing for the consortium he represents.

This also explains his quick-trigger appointment of Graham Potter from Brighton, a Manager who is a stylistic builder, rather than a short-term results-oriented one. 

Premier League All-Star game

The suggestion of an All-Star Game to fund the pyramid is largely about raising the value of Chelsea. It makes the health of the English football pyramid stronger. Boehly, unlike the other American owners, wants a healthy structure. Therefore, the assets he manages continue to appreciate in value.

This is a different approach than other US owners, like FSG at Liverpool and the Glazers. In fact, the Glazers were the masterminds behind the infamous Project Big Picture. This 2020 proposal aimed to five big Premier League clubs an even bigger financial advantage over the rest of the pyramid. 

Boehly’s All-Star Game suggestion is absurd in a calendar that is already congested. His playoff suggestions irk the traditionalists domestically in the sport. But, fundamentally, he’s looking at this from a different angle than the US-based owners of Liverpool and Manchester United. Boehly is probably looking at the stability of Manchester City with its stated “holistic” approach as a model to emulate. Yet, given his experience in American sport, it comes with the usual American sporting suggestions. 

It is easy to write off Boehly’s All-Star Game and playoff ideas as usual Americanization. It is much deeper than that. His recent suggestions are irritating and ultimately unneeded. Unlike some of Boehly’s American ownership counterparts, he is looking at a long-term project. That project focuses around increasing the visibility and, consequently, the economic viability of the English game. 

This, he believes, ultimately benefits Chelsea and the investors he represents in the future.  

200+ Channels With Sports & News
  • Starting price: $33/mo. for fubo Latino Package
  • Watch Premier League, World Cup, Euro 2024 & more
Live & On Demand TV Streaming
  • Price: $35/mo. for Sling Blue
  • Watch Premier League, World Cup & MLS
Many Sports & ESPN Originals
  • Price: $9.99/mo. (or get ESPN+, Hulu & Disney+ for $13.99/mo.)
  • Features Bundesliga, LaLiga, Championship, & more
2,000+ soccer games per year
  • Price: $4.99/mo
  • Features Champions League, Serie A, Europa League & NWSL
175 Premier League Games & PL TV
  • Starting price: $4.99/mo. for Peacock Premium
  • Watch 175 exclusive EPL games per season
110+ channels, live & on-demand
  • Price: $59.95/mo. for Plus Package
  • Includes FOX, FS1, ESPN, TUDN & more

4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Michael F

    September 15, 2022 at 9:58 am

    I think the issue with such a suggestion raised is the concern that these suggestions go too far and go beyond the initial premise of ‘just’ an all-star game. He also suggested a playoff, which definitely mirrors an American sports and no one in England and even soccer fans here following EPL want.

    I am an American and I follow the NFL and the EPL but the reason I find the domestic structure of European soccer so appealing is because it is so different, and I want to see no part of it changing.

    I firmly believe most are afraid of it shifting to a more American model due to such American influence. One thing usually leads to another. Be careful what you wish for. Aside from that, the mere suggestion of an preseason all-star game in itself is harmless. But it’s the notion of change toward American way of structure that concerns fans and I totally get it.

    And btw… Klopp is simply doing his duty to protect the current structure s d culture with his reply. I totally get that too.

  2. Mercator

    September 15, 2022 at 7:58 am

    Brilliant article Kartik, thank you very much for discussing this with actual facts and logic.

    These ideas everyone hates are simply suggestions for how to raise money for the lower leagues. Of course the PL clubs could just send down some of the current revenues, but none of them want to do that. No one seems to mention this fact – there would be no need for suggestions of alternative revenue streams if the PL clubs would share the current ones. They won’t, and yet Klopp will run around on his high horse like he is defending something sacrosanct. In fact, it is not Bohley that is being greedy, it’s the other owners who refuse to share a dime with lower leagues.

    I fully agree as well Bohley wants a stronger LEAGUE because that is what will raise the value of Chelsea. This is how the EPL came to be so dominant, by recognizing that the league drives growth, not individual clubs. Now for Chelsea’s short term success this may not be an ideal approach (I don’t like Chelsea so hope they suffer), but from a long term perspective for the entire EPL, Bohley is the IDEAL owner because he believes the only way to improve the value of his investment is to improve the value of the whole league.

    It’s also pretty clear his transfer policy is just going to be Chelsea/City loan army on steroids. He comes from baseball and is wondering why he needs to pay $100 million for a player in their prime when he can sign a dozen potential recruits for very little, loan them to a feeder club, and then only use the ones that make the 1st team Chelsea cut. This is basically the baseball farm system. This is also a very smart strategy at the club level – United are idiots and just buy at the peak, Bohley doesn’t want to do that long term. He wants to horde young talent. We can argue what sort of damage things like feeder clubs do to the game, but from an EPL perspective, very few things can ensure the long term dominance of the league like the major clubs setting up feeders and hording young talent from across the globe.

    He isn’t stupid, he knows exactly what he is doing and I think if you look at it from a business perspective its very shrewd. Fundamentally, Bohley bought the club expecting the EPL to be the super league, that’s the only way he gets value out of this $5 billion acquisition. He doesn’t want to set up a new super league, but he is clear the EPL should be the super league and if that means all star games and feeder clubs then that is what he will push for.

    Very good article thank you again for actually thinking this through instead of just yelling Americanization bad.

  3. Arthur

    September 14, 2022 at 8:07 pm

    As someone who has followed the Dodgers for many years, I have been struck by how different what Boehly is doing at Chelsea is from the Dodgers takeover. The new ownership group of the Dodgers was very low profile. They brought in a bunch of really smart baseball people and then stayed in the background. When the owners did appear in articles, it was Mark Walter or the celebrity owners and they weren’t opining about the future of the game or rule changes.

    • Eric T

      September 14, 2022 at 8:25 pm

      They just took over and Boehly is trying to bring those guys in right now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Latest News

SOCCER TV SCHEDULES APP

STREAMING OFFERS

Fubo
Includes: Premier League + 84 Sports Channels
7-Day Free Trial


ESPN+
Includes: Bundesliga & La Liga
Sign Up


Paramount+
Includes: Champions League & Serie A
7-Day Free Trial


Peacock
Includes: Premier League
Sign Up


Sling
Includes: USA, NBC, FOX, FS1 + more
Browse Offers


More in Chelsea

Translate »